Patch v. Seattle SeahawksWe defended the Seattle Seahawks against claims by an employee that he was retaliated against, after alleging that his supervisors had used a racial epithet. The plaintiff claimed that negative performance evaluations and his subsequent termination were in response to his protected activity, and also claimed retaliation based on First & Goal’s interactions with him post-termination. Court granted First & Goal’s motion for summary judgment, dismissing all claims. |